Dear comrades, I write this note to express a mood, without claiming to enter the debate, frankly, depressing who is accompanying Rifondazione for months and without expecting to be understood.
state of mind of a militant, born in PCI, which I joined in 1971 at 14 years, I lived the story "dissolvers" triggered by the Bolognina to join, then, since the PRC meeting in the Brancaccio Theatre Rome, since we were "Movement" with the provisional membership card in your wallet and that exceptional leader, whose name was Sergio Garavini as secretary.
In 37 years I "ate" bread and politics in the ranks of a party that explicitly drew on the values \u200b\u200bof "Communism", understood as a real movement to abolish the present state of things (other than "cultural trend" companion Bertinotti!).
With pride I played, and still I carry out the institutional functions that PRC has called me for nine years Mayor of my city, Eboli, for the first two years, the municipal council of opposition, and three and a half years of the Regional Director Campania.
Once Perhaps I should have been placed among the "middle" of the party. When there was a party organization and a selection of paintings.
The struggle to weave the threads to fill a few small armchair, the cynical use of the Regulation, "fuck" some are companion practices from which, with accuracy, I kept away.
To me, at other times, the battle had been taught that politics is the exchange of ideas, even harsh, but in a large "power unit".
So at the end of a tough debate, exasperated, had to affirm that the capacity of synthesis between different positions.
This allows a party to be united, while in a comparison that kept itself and analysis, and allows those who led the party to be, actually, the Secretary of everyone and not a part.
There was no need to propose, generously, the condition and management of a political party established in most shots.
Caro Ferrero, so we do not build a party, but the foundations were laid for a crystallization of positions and, therefore, first signs of a split (at this point would be to split the atom). But I am not surprised
del'epilogo of our (or should I say your) Congress (I followed with detachment and confusion).
was a film already seen. The party
out of a defeat of devastating proportions, which is not only political, but, unfortunately, mainly cultural.
For the first time in this post-war values \u200b\u200band culture to become hegemonic in Italy right and the left can be found, not only for the "expulsion" from the Parliament, and discharge to a marginal role.
This disaster will not be determined in a few months or two years of the Prodi government.
A reading like this, frankly, I think car acquittal of the management team that in recent years, has "built" this party in a certain way, regardless of how today is "smeared" in the various motions.
You want me to believe that the worker Mirafiori interviewed by "Liberation" after April 13 and that clearly said, "I do not even understand that the Communists about .. or say," has come to these conclusions after two years of the Prodi government, or the disappearance of the Sickle and Hammer, or the appeal to the "useful vote" veltroniana of memory?
If we had lost 2% then this interpretation could be valid. But faced with the defeat of the April 13 no! Definitely not we!
Where were the workers in the last ten years of life of the PRC?
We thought of "contaminated" with the movements. Right! But where are now the peace movement? What anti-globalization? Or that civil rights? Mistake or all closed in upon themselves?
I look around and wonder: what is the social subject that I find myself in an unavoidable conflict with the condition of capital? With the economic choices, social and cultural forces that capitalism?
today as a year ago as ten years ago.
The answer is always the same: the workers! Even more so today, when the capitalist world is shaken by a crisis comparable to that of 1929.
Of course, no longer working class understood in the traditional way! Today in the definition must be considered precarious, women are still paying the difference in general, employees who do not arrive at the fourth week, migrant workers, without rights, young people who have not yet 30/35 years the opportunity to build a future because without stable employment, those thousands of workers who had but that future has been stolen with the expulsion of the working world.
These are our social subjects of reference.
They must be able to give a concrete answer on the ground today, of employment, the plan of a different development. Which party
we have built over the years?
We do not go well the party classic "Twentieth Century"?
But what has been proposed as an alternative? The party
"light," who renounces his role as "intellectual" collective autonomy with its own design and proposed! A party
all aimed to assert its "credibility" as a "reliable ally" of the center - left in which the role of "institutional" became decisive in dealing with social issues.
Goodbye "collective intellect"! Able to discuss and discuss and to translate these discussions into a proposed policy on where to look for comparison with potential allies. A party
hypocritical, pervaded by a desire for exclusion of dissent. This
we built. How many years
fellow losers who voted motions (old bad habit that motions to the conference!) Were excluded from the governing bodies at all levels?
Strange way to select the managers, not by the value of the companions, but on the basis of reliability.
And the moral question what happened?
But you really want to persuade me that no one has taken up the "genetic mutation" that PRC was undergoing in recent years? Then he cried shame on the stage play with the cards in Congress! A culture
best companies, where the important is to handle the "power" in the party, deeply veined by a Stalinist culture (always hard to die!) In which dissent is banned.
Perhaps the acts of the Party in Rome there will still be the letters of formal notice to that circle of Eboli in 1997/98 was a real political laboratory (more than houses of the left! We we had already built!) in which the group leader, treasurer, half were fellow directors without a card.
But the section was always full. There was discussion.
Then all members, but only and always four friends at the bar!
Against this dramatic picture of the state party, a devastating electoral choices, I would expect the opening of a great season of listening to those who vote for us and voted us the most, of those workers who do not understand what ca .. or say (other than leaflets of the new secretary before the factory. Pathetic). But no! This conference seeks precipitation.
on opposing motions, on the other, plaster to debate and settle the score! No holds barred fight to "carve up" an empty shell.
We talked, and we continue to talk "to ourselves about ourselves"!
A transaction intended to recycle all of a leadership team that, today, beyond the motions of membership, is still all there.
Can I ask where is the news? But most of all: where is the analysis phase?
Can I ask what this has served to show vertical fracture if not the inability to "synthesis"?
I ask if at the end of this path quell'operaio that Congress did not understand or a ca .. now understand something of what we say?
Can I ask if this congress has served to left, PRC, the country?
I ask if the worker (again) understood what the motion proposes Vendola which meets on his own and starts parallel to the membership?
I ask the secretary if Ferrero continues to move ahead with "spot reports" low profile, rather than in-depth analysis of the phase, considered to rebuild a party?
And I can still ask what is the point that the Left in this country (all outside parliament, bent under the blows of the right and the Democratic Party who want to kick us by the European Parliament that all together do not reach the 5%) is divided in five or six small parties? E with the arrogance and the intent of suicide continue to be divided! Vendola wants Democratic Left but not Diliberto, Diliberto wants the PRC, but not the Democratic Left, Ferrando would just Ferrero, Ferrero, frankly, I did not understand who it wants to seek unity as it can not even meet with Vendola.
Dear comrades, I am not convinced.
On this road there is only the dissolution not only of the Communist Party of the PRC, not only of the Communist Left, but the Left as a whole.
I would like to invite you to stop.
to fix a lot of pause in the internal comparison, Chianciano as if there had never been, and now open the campaign is not listening wanted to run first. We laugh not so much the voice
to 45,000 members (Revelli is right: At least let's keep this data hidden miserable) lined and covered, but all her friends and classmates, members and non members, to those who voted and now no more, those who votarci and would not do it because we are disgusted by the combination, because the workers are the protagonists of the debate, not because they read a flyer, the precarious, women, the residual movements.
Removing the Congress!
dress ourselves by bringing into play all of humility.
We find the courage to get consensus and "farts" in the assemblies, in workplaces, in neighborhoods, in schools. We
to investigate the phase.
try to understand who we represent, what we need today.
I remain convinced of the historical necessity of building a "great left", which takes in everything that is not the Democratic Party, which should aim to build a mass organization, perhaps going beyond the arrangements of the parties' 900, but trying to take the best of those experiences: the ability to be "collective intellectual" and the like precious and unifying the labor movement, the inspiration of the moral issue as a way of understanding the role of the political autonomy of the project and its ability d consider the problem of social and political alliances, the ability to be, as Ross would say Rossanda "place of convergence of many lives, a dense fabric of wires often valuable," in which the Communists, rediscover the fun of building hegemony, if they have the capacity.
If not that, I think, we will reduce our waving red flags, while around the world is going through major upheavals that we fail to grasp since the Great Depression of the heart of the capitalist system. News
orchestra of the Titanic.
I realize that is not easy.
Way has followed to date, the division of the testimony, the pure and hard, is more comfortable, easier. But it does not pay. No need to build a 'other'.
I can only wish you. I
, Militan I was and will remain so.
continue to have the card in his pocket but with it there, in my heart of the old communist, now, the disillusionment.
For the rest I was a heretic in recent years, the exaltation of the misaligned Bertinotti - thought, I'll stay and heretical.
'd rather die like this, maintaining that the PCI taught me to be the most valuable asset a Communist: the autonomy of thought.
state of mind of a militant, born in PCI, which I joined in 1971 at 14 years, I lived the story "dissolvers" triggered by the Bolognina to join, then, since the PRC meeting in the Brancaccio Theatre Rome, since we were "Movement" with the provisional membership card in your wallet and that exceptional leader, whose name was Sergio Garavini as secretary.
In 37 years I "ate" bread and politics in the ranks of a party that explicitly drew on the values \u200b\u200bof "Communism", understood as a real movement to abolish the present state of things (other than "cultural trend" companion Bertinotti!).
With pride I played, and still I carry out the institutional functions that PRC has called me for nine years Mayor of my city, Eboli, for the first two years, the municipal council of opposition, and three and a half years of the Regional Director Campania.
Once Perhaps I should have been placed among the "middle" of the party. When there was a party organization and a selection of paintings.
The struggle to weave the threads to fill a few small armchair, the cynical use of the Regulation, "fuck" some are companion practices from which, with accuracy, I kept away.
To me, at other times, the battle had been taught that politics is the exchange of ideas, even harsh, but in a large "power unit".
So at the end of a tough debate, exasperated, had to affirm that the capacity of synthesis between different positions.
This allows a party to be united, while in a comparison that kept itself and analysis, and allows those who led the party to be, actually, the Secretary of everyone and not a part.
There was no need to propose, generously, the condition and management of a political party established in most shots.
Caro Ferrero, so we do not build a party, but the foundations were laid for a crystallization of positions and, therefore, first signs of a split (at this point would be to split the atom). But I am not surprised
del'epilogo of our (or should I say your) Congress (I followed with detachment and confusion).
was a film already seen. The party
out of a defeat of devastating proportions, which is not only political, but, unfortunately, mainly cultural.
For the first time in this post-war values \u200b\u200band culture to become hegemonic in Italy right and the left can be found, not only for the "expulsion" from the Parliament, and discharge to a marginal role.
This disaster will not be determined in a few months or two years of the Prodi government.
A reading like this, frankly, I think car acquittal of the management team that in recent years, has "built" this party in a certain way, regardless of how today is "smeared" in the various motions.
You want me to believe that the worker Mirafiori interviewed by "Liberation" after April 13 and that clearly said, "I do not even understand that the Communists about .. or say," has come to these conclusions after two years of the Prodi government, or the disappearance of the Sickle and Hammer, or the appeal to the "useful vote" veltroniana of memory?
If we had lost 2% then this interpretation could be valid. But faced with the defeat of the April 13 no! Definitely not we!
Where were the workers in the last ten years of life of the PRC?
We thought of "contaminated" with the movements. Right! But where are now the peace movement? What anti-globalization? Or that civil rights? Mistake or all closed in upon themselves?
I look around and wonder: what is the social subject that I find myself in an unavoidable conflict with the condition of capital? With the economic choices, social and cultural forces that capitalism?
today as a year ago as ten years ago.
The answer is always the same: the workers! Even more so today, when the capitalist world is shaken by a crisis comparable to that of 1929.
Of course, no longer working class understood in the traditional way! Today in the definition must be considered precarious, women are still paying the difference in general, employees who do not arrive at the fourth week, migrant workers, without rights, young people who have not yet 30/35 years the opportunity to build a future because without stable employment, those thousands of workers who had but that future has been stolen with the expulsion of the working world.
These are our social subjects of reference.
They must be able to give a concrete answer on the ground today, of employment, the plan of a different development. Which party
we have built over the years?
We do not go well the party classic "Twentieth Century"?
But what has been proposed as an alternative? The party
"light," who renounces his role as "intellectual" collective autonomy with its own design and proposed! A party
all aimed to assert its "credibility" as a "reliable ally" of the center - left in which the role of "institutional" became decisive in dealing with social issues.
Goodbye "collective intellect"! Able to discuss and discuss and to translate these discussions into a proposed policy on where to look for comparison with potential allies. A party
hypocritical, pervaded by a desire for exclusion of dissent. This
we built. How many years
fellow losers who voted motions (old bad habit that motions to the conference!) Were excluded from the governing bodies at all levels?
Strange way to select the managers, not by the value of the companions, but on the basis of reliability.
And the moral question what happened?
But you really want to persuade me that no one has taken up the "genetic mutation" that PRC was undergoing in recent years? Then he cried shame on the stage play with the cards in Congress! A culture
best companies, where the important is to handle the "power" in the party, deeply veined by a Stalinist culture (always hard to die!) In which dissent is banned.
Perhaps the acts of the Party in Rome there will still be the letters of formal notice to that circle of Eboli in 1997/98 was a real political laboratory (more than houses of the left! We we had already built!) in which the group leader, treasurer, half were fellow directors without a card.
But the section was always full. There was discussion.
Then all members, but only and always four friends at the bar!
Against this dramatic picture of the state party, a devastating electoral choices, I would expect the opening of a great season of listening to those who vote for us and voted us the most, of those workers who do not understand what ca .. or say (other than leaflets of the new secretary before the factory. Pathetic). But no! This conference seeks precipitation.
on opposing motions, on the other, plaster to debate and settle the score! No holds barred fight to "carve up" an empty shell.
We talked, and we continue to talk "to ourselves about ourselves"!
A transaction intended to recycle all of a leadership team that, today, beyond the motions of membership, is still all there.
Can I ask where is the news? But most of all: where is the analysis phase?
Can I ask what this has served to show vertical fracture if not the inability to "synthesis"?
I ask if at the end of this path quell'operaio that Congress did not understand or a ca .. now understand something of what we say?
Can I ask if this congress has served to left, PRC, the country?
I ask if the worker (again) understood what the motion proposes Vendola which meets on his own and starts parallel to the membership?
I ask the secretary if Ferrero continues to move ahead with "spot reports" low profile, rather than in-depth analysis of the phase, considered to rebuild a party?
And I can still ask what is the point that the Left in this country (all outside parliament, bent under the blows of the right and the Democratic Party who want to kick us by the European Parliament that all together do not reach the 5%) is divided in five or six small parties? E with the arrogance and the intent of suicide continue to be divided! Vendola wants Democratic Left but not Diliberto, Diliberto wants the PRC, but not the Democratic Left, Ferrando would just Ferrero, Ferrero, frankly, I did not understand who it wants to seek unity as it can not even meet with Vendola.
Dear comrades, I am not convinced.
On this road there is only the dissolution not only of the Communist Party of the PRC, not only of the Communist Left, but the Left as a whole.
I would like to invite you to stop.
to fix a lot of pause in the internal comparison, Chianciano as if there had never been, and now open the campaign is not listening wanted to run first. We laugh not so much the voice
to 45,000 members (Revelli is right: At least let's keep this data hidden miserable) lined and covered, but all her friends and classmates, members and non members, to those who voted and now no more, those who votarci and would not do it because we are disgusted by the combination, because the workers are the protagonists of the debate, not because they read a flyer, the precarious, women, the residual movements.
Removing the Congress!
dress ourselves by bringing into play all of humility.
We find the courage to get consensus and "farts" in the assemblies, in workplaces, in neighborhoods, in schools. We
to investigate the phase.
try to understand who we represent, what we need today.
I remain convinced of the historical necessity of building a "great left", which takes in everything that is not the Democratic Party, which should aim to build a mass organization, perhaps going beyond the arrangements of the parties' 900, but trying to take the best of those experiences: the ability to be "collective intellectual" and the like precious and unifying the labor movement, the inspiration of the moral issue as a way of understanding the role of the political autonomy of the project and its ability d consider the problem of social and political alliances, the ability to be, as Ross would say Rossanda "place of convergence of many lives, a dense fabric of wires often valuable," in which the Communists, rediscover the fun of building hegemony, if they have the capacity.
If not that, I think, we will reduce our waving red flags, while around the world is going through major upheavals that we fail to grasp since the Great Depression of the heart of the capitalist system. News
orchestra of the Titanic.
I realize that is not easy.
Way has followed to date, the division of the testimony, the pure and hard, is more comfortable, easier. But it does not pay. No need to build a 'other'.
I can only wish you. I
, Militan I was and will remain so.
continue to have the card in his pocket but with it there, in my heart of the old communist, now, the disillusionment.
For the rest I was a heretic in recent years, the exaltation of the misaligned Bertinotti - thought, I'll stay and heretical.
'd rather die like this, maintaining that the PCI taught me to be the most valuable asset a Communist: the autonomy of thought.
0 comments:
Post a Comment