Here we go again! With a nearly scientific returns the alarm in the Piana del Sele health! They close the hospitals in Battipaglia and Eboli. Dismantling departments. Six years ago the national press (L'Espresso), lists hospitals closing bell at risk and among these, of course, Eboli.
the growing public alarm. Arrive on time the protests. Declarations of war are wasted. It is noisy protests threaten by local representatives. On the other hand technicians, directors general and administrative, such as computers pitted crazy numbers and figures to show that the situation is not sustainable. As if the health, and I'll add the "Education" were matters to be addressed with the eye of the accountant.
a problem of overlap of the hospitals there is incontrovertible. But the data in the province of Salerno and Battipaglia exists only for Eboli is frankly unacceptable.
For years in the Campania region, and the province of Salerno was no exception, health policy was intended as the opening of new hospitals in the house of a "powerful" on duty. Do the list would be something not too difficult.
Reduce the issue of "hospitals overlaps with overlapping Battipaglia and Eboli is not only misleading but, I believe, dangerous as we're talking about principals production, with great development potential and with a user base of hundreds of thousands of people. Positivity is not seen elsewhere.
But the worst thing, however, is trying to solve everything with a problem of numbers and figures.
I believe that the problem is more of a financial nature that relates to the rationality and quality of public health response.
first question: can the whole health response should be centered on the garrison hospital? So even the "sneeze" should lead to hospitalization. And the choice to start up the districts, the principals of the network of health services that they did as a filter to the hospital?
Second question: Can some health benefits, or certain imaging techniques to pass exclusively through private arrangement? What percentage of the budget covering the conventions ASL Sa2 and what the public? And that policy of "balancing" strongly affirmed in the REGIONAL HOSPITAL PLAN what happened? That said, the province of Salerno in the hospital problem of duplication, the irrationality of the public health response is more obvious is probably true. So much so that during the debate in the regional council of Paine hospital, was on "Salerno question" who jammed the discussion.
Battipaglia and Eboli (and we also think of other presidents?) Are in a position to give an answer that goes in the direction of rationalization: the hospital one of the Sele plain. Located in the middle between the two cities with an interstate exit. A new structure, built with modern standards, which combines, enhances and celebrates the experience and expertise existing in the two existing principals. Without penalty. A structure that is eligible for reasons such as hospital self- capable of responding to emergencies in a huge area but also provide answers to excellence. There will discuss what this part of the Regional? Local government? ASL Sa2 direction? If this is the answers will be consequential:
1) the commissioner has in place funding, authorization and political will;
2) common to field planning and administrative procedures to allow the work.
3) The Director-General let loose closure of departments, humiliation or degradation of this or what the hospital. Then nothing the emergency closure of Gynecology Battipaglia or Eboli. Would only to exasperate the minds.
the growing public alarm. Arrive on time the protests. Declarations of war are wasted. It is noisy protests threaten by local representatives. On the other hand technicians, directors general and administrative, such as computers pitted crazy numbers and figures to show that the situation is not sustainable. As if the health, and I'll add the "Education" were matters to be addressed with the eye of the accountant.
a problem of overlap of the hospitals there is incontrovertible. But the data in the province of Salerno and Battipaglia exists only for Eboli is frankly unacceptable.
For years in the Campania region, and the province of Salerno was no exception, health policy was intended as the opening of new hospitals in the house of a "powerful" on duty. Do the list would be something not too difficult.
Reduce the issue of "hospitals overlaps with overlapping Battipaglia and Eboli is not only misleading but, I believe, dangerous as we're talking about principals production, with great development potential and with a user base of hundreds of thousands of people. Positivity is not seen elsewhere.
But the worst thing, however, is trying to solve everything with a problem of numbers and figures.
I believe that the problem is more of a financial nature that relates to the rationality and quality of public health response.
first question: can the whole health response should be centered on the garrison hospital? So even the "sneeze" should lead to hospitalization. And the choice to start up the districts, the principals of the network of health services that they did as a filter to the hospital?
Second question: Can some health benefits, or certain imaging techniques to pass exclusively through private arrangement? What percentage of the budget covering the conventions ASL Sa2 and what the public? And that policy of "balancing" strongly affirmed in the REGIONAL HOSPITAL PLAN what happened? That said, the province of Salerno in the hospital problem of duplication, the irrationality of the public health response is more obvious is probably true. So much so that during the debate in the regional council of Paine hospital, was on "Salerno question" who jammed the discussion.
Battipaglia and Eboli (and we also think of other presidents?) Are in a position to give an answer that goes in the direction of rationalization: the hospital one of the Sele plain. Located in the middle between the two cities with an interstate exit. A new structure, built with modern standards, which combines, enhances and celebrates the experience and expertise existing in the two existing principals. Without penalty. A structure that is eligible for reasons such as hospital self- capable of responding to emergencies in a huge area but also provide answers to excellence. There will discuss what this part of the Regional? Local government? ASL Sa2 direction? If this is the answers will be consequential:
1) the commissioner has in place funding, authorization and political will;
2) common to field planning and administrative procedures to allow the work.
3) The Director-General let loose closure of departments, humiliation or degradation of this or what the hospital. Then nothing the emergency closure of Gynecology Battipaglia or Eboli. Would only to exasperate the minds.
0 comments:
Post a Comment